<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance and Scalalability Improvements in Oracle 10g and 11g</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tanelpoder.com/2008/05/25/performance-and-scalalability-improvements-in-oracle-10g-and-11g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tanelpoder.com/2008/05/25/performance-and-scalalability-improvements-in-oracle-10g-and-11g/</link>
	<description>Oracle troubleshooting, internals and performance tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polarski bernard</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanelpoder.com/2008/05/25/performance-and-scalalability-improvements-in-oracle-10g-and-11g/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Polarski bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tanelpoder.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Blurring the bondaries between SGA and PGA will quickly poses the question of keeping the definition for thes 2 strucutres. Let me guess, it will be named OGA : Oracle Global Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blurring the bondaries between SGA and PGA will quickly poses the question of keeping the definition for thes 2 strucutres. Let me guess, it will be named OGA : Oracle Global Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noons</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanelpoder.com/2008/05/25/performance-and-scalalability-improvements-in-oracle-10g-and-11g/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Noons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tanelpoder.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Great!  Even more plan changes over multiple executions of the same SQL.

As if we didn&#039;t have enough problems with optimizer plans that change at the whiff of a stat...

Hasn&#039;t anyone got back to Oracle the clear message that what production environments need is a STABLE and PREDICTABLE optimizer?

Not something that keeps changing execution plans at the drop of a hat?

I can&#039;t wait to see what will happen in closed, non-changing environments such as Peoplesoft, JDE, Siebel and even Oracle&#039;s own apps when this ever-changing optimizer is unleashed on them...

At least give us the option of turning off all this unneeded overhead!

Ah well: one can only dream...

Thanks for the superb analysis, Tanel.  Much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!  Even more plan changes over multiple executions of the same SQL.</p>
<p>As if we didn&#8217;t have enough problems with optimizer plans that change at the whiff of a stat&#8230;</p>
<p>Hasn&#8217;t anyone got back to Oracle the clear message that what production environments need is a STABLE and PREDICTABLE optimizer?</p>
<p>Not something that keeps changing execution plans at the drop of a hat?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see what will happen in closed, non-changing environments such as Peoplesoft, JDE, Siebel and even Oracle&#8217;s own apps when this ever-changing optimizer is unleashed on them&#8230;</p>
<p>At least give us the option of turning off all this unneeded overhead!</p>
<p>Ah well: one can only dream&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the superb analysis, Tanel.  Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
